THE ALGORISTS, historical notes by Roman Verostko
Peter Beyls, 1988
Ghent, Belgium
Untitled algorithmic pen plotter drawing tinted with watercolor.
11.5" by 16.5"
Artist's software
Hardware: Symbolics 3600 & HP plotter© p.beyls
Note: This page presents a brief orientation to the origin of the term "algorist" in 20th Century art. The term was introduced in 1995 to identify those artists who employ original algorithms in the process of creating their art. This artistic practice has a very deep history but there had been no common label for the artists who employ the process. Algorithmic art, implemented with the aid of computers, reaches back to the 1960's but algorithmic art precedes the advent of computers. We introduced the term specifically to help identify a unique and important practice that experienced an impetus with the advent of computing power. The history of algorist practice is rooted in the history of algorithmic art that dates back to prehistoric times in weaving and tool making. For a briefing on algorithm in art and history see algorithmic art. Last update: 9/29/2006 (rv) Who are the algorists? Simply put, algorists are artists who create art using algorithmic procedures that include their own algorithms. The term was introduced in 1995 to identify artists who employed original algorithms in the process of creating their art. Such procedures apply to a very broad spectrum of art practice coursing through the history of art.
Hans Dehlinger, Kassel,
GermanyD162 "Turm", 1993
Paper: 11.75" by 16.5"Pen & ink. algorithmic pen plotted drawing.
Private Collection
© h.dehlinger
The rise of algorithmic art in the last half of the 20th Century began in the earlier days of computing when there was no software for artists. Artists engaging the new technologies had to either collaborate with technicians or create their own procedures. For example, Manfred Mohr, an experienced algorist in the 1960's, created his own software.
Venues for algorithmic art emerged in the last quarter of the 20th century began in the earlier days of computing when engineers and artists often collaborated in developing procedures for visualization achieved with algorithms implemented with computing power. Software and technical procedures for visualization grew hand in hand with hardware. Artists engaging new computing and visualizing technologies had to either collaborate with technicians or create their own procedures (algorithms). First generation algorists of the 1970's included Harold Cohen, Herbert Franke, Manfred Mohr, Frieder Nake, and George Nees.
Venues for exhibiting algorithmic art emerged in the late 1970's and 1980's when various symposia and conferences, both national and international, began including exhibitions and papers related to the use of computing procedures in the arts. (See note 1). Leonardo, the quarterly on art science and technology, played an important role for emerging algorithmic art by including essays and documentation of exhibitions for ISEA, the Digital Salon, and SIGGRAPH.
By the 1980's a number of artists using original algorithms had achieved distinctive styles, each with a body of mature work. Working independently of each other, several found that they had shared many similar experiences over the years. Following the 1995 panel on "Artists and Algorithms" in Los Angeles, Ken Musgrave, Jean Pierre Hebert and I briefly discussed forming an informal group of artists who shared similar interests. Having engaged in algorithmic procedures for many years we experienced a need to create an identity for those who shared this practice. (Note 2)
Pearl Park Scripture - P, Galileo, 2004 , Algorithmic pen & ink plotter drawing The glyph-like text is an algorithmic transliteration quoted from Galileo Galilei, 1623
(click here for more info)For several months we corresponded in search of a term with possible ways to share views. Eventually we settled on the term "algorist" as proposed by JPH. This term most probably descended from the name of an Arabian mathematician who was active around 820 AD in Baghdad. It is believed that his surname, al-Khowarazmi is the source for the term algorism.
The use of the term algorism appeared with various spellings in several languages and often with latinizing influence as in algorismus. In English the term algorism came to be replaced with the term algorithm which is more commonly used today. So one who employs algorithms (algorisms) would be an algorist.
Jean Pierre Hebert, 1999
Santa Barbara, CAArtist's coded procedure.from 100 views of a megagon.
giclee print 8" by 8" image on paper, Somerset Book, measuring 12.75" by 19".
© j.p.hebertAs artists employing algorithmic procedures the term algorist fit our interests well. In general we are fairly agreed that algorists are artists who include original algorithmic procedures in the course of creating their work. The use of algorithms in and of itself does not constitute algorist work. It is the inclusion of one's own algorithms that makes the difference. (See Note 3)
As algorists with or without computers, we all employ algorithms created by colleagues and predecessors. Basic tools like geometry and perspective come to mind. We depend on algorithms others have created for everything from the circuit logic and operating system of our computers to the languages and the editors that we use.
The algorist goes one step further by introducing original algorithms for generating "art". The jewel of algorist art lies in the artist's own "form-generating algorithm", the artist's unique procedure for creating the form. From this perspective Mozart's score for a Sonata, the architects plan for the building, and Hans Dehlinger's code for a drawing are all "form-generating" algorithms.
Algorists may be found throughout the history of art. Our algorist predecessors range from Twentieth century conceptual artists to prehistoric basket weavers who were innovators. See Note 4
Mark Wilson USA "12D90", 1990 plotter drawing
36 x 48 inches (91 x 121 cm.), pen & ink on paper. Private collection.
© m.wilsonFinally, one aspect of the algorist definition remains open to interpretation. An algorist, by definition, creates "art". One might employ original algorithms in creating a scientific visualization that some may view as "art". Yet the visualization may not fit another's conception of "art". Or one might employ original algorithms and create work that one person may experience as art while another may not experience it as art. The definition does not attempt to identify what constitutes "art".
The sculptor, Helaman Ferguson, an algorist pioneer, made this impression directly from his coded carvings in Verostko's studio in 1997. signed with code: 961026165417 . . .
© h.ferguson
The history of algorist art in the last quarter of the 20th Century presents many interesting questions on the very nature of art. We may expect as studies of late 20th Century exhibitions and catalogues emerge that many algorists with surprisingly interesting work and perspectives will emerge.
Ken Musgrave, USA Inkjet on rag paper
4 of 5, ca. 1995An early example of the artist's code for generating worlds of form.
Private collection
© k.musgrave
Although algorists had been active since the 1970's there was no "algorist" site addressing algorist concerns. In 1996, J.P. Hebert introduced several pages dedicated to the algorists. These pages spelled out essential features of "algorist" art, historical precedents, and links to related topics and issues. These initial pages identified an informal group of active algorists including Yoshiyuke Abbe, Harrold Cohen, Hans Dehlinger, Helaman Ferguson, Manfred Mohr, Vera Molnar, Mark Wilson, and many others. Clearly our algorist definition would especially embrace many important algorists like Paul Brown and Earnest Edmonds whose contributions have been extremely valuable to the algorithmic revolution. It was understood that a deeper understanding of algorist theory and practice, including a studied history of its practitioners, would emerge in the years ahead.
Vlatko Čerić, 2005
Zagreb, CroatiaEvolution #5 of 10
digital print, 6.7" by 6.7" on Hahnemuhle paper measuring 11.7" by 16.5" .Vlatko Čerić is one of many algorists, who employ generative procedures and demonstrate the breadth and depth of algorist artistic achievement.
Many first generation algorists worked with pen plotters as their first graphic interface. Some shared a common history that grew out of conceptual art and an interest in the emerging information processing technologies of the 1960's. This was long before the internet and the computing power driving 21st Century culture. Put in perspective the first generation algorists mark a stage in the growth of generative procedures in the arts. The numerous sites and groups involved with generative art at the turn of the century testify to a remarkable growth of coded procedures in virtually all the arts. As this 21st Century unfolds generative art emerges as a major force in the creative arts. See: http://www.generative.net
- Roman Verostko, 2007 penplot.com
Patric Prince (Art Historian) poses with 3 algorists in San Diego, August, 2003.
Left to Right: Hans Dehlinger, Patric Prince, Jean Pierre Hebert, Roman Verostko
Note 1. By the late 1980's the established symposia and exhibition venues that were known to me included: The Inter-Society for Electronic Art (ISEA), SIGGRAPH and Ars Electronica . The annual Small Computers in the Arts conference (Philadelphia, 1980 ff) was also an important venue in the U.S. recognizing the impact of the PC for individual artists. At all of these conferences artists could see the work of others and share mutual concerns. The exhibitions, papers, panels, and publications of these venues provided an overview of what was generally called "computer art" but there was no single venue for specifically "algorist" work.
Roman Verostko, The Magic Hand of Chance, 1982. Photo of monitor, frame from an algorithmic sequence, © r.verostko
To address algorithmic procedure in the arts I organized a small symposium at the Minneapolis College of Art and Design in 1991 (February 23/24). This symposium Art & Algorithm - Mind & Machine, included an audio visual show, "Images of the Unseen From the Worlds of Art & Science". The presentation of video, sound tracks and slides included the work of 23 artists and scientists from 6 countries.
Algorithmic drawing
Vera Molnar
74.338/14.29.00
c.1990Courtesy of the artist for the 1991 symposium on Art & algorithm... .
©v.molnar
Artists and scientists whose work was shown included: Stephen C.G.Bell (UK), Donna Cox (US), Charlotte Davies (Canada), Hans Dehlinger (Germany), Helamen Ferguson (US), Samia A. Halaby (US), Bruce Hamilton (US), Jean Pierre Hebert (US), Yoichiro Kawaguchi (Japan), William Latham (UK), Vera Molnar (France), Jim Otis (US), Clifford Pickover (US), Jeffrey Ventrella (US), Mark Wilson (US), Toshifumi Kawahara (Japan).
Note 2. In 1993 at the Minneapolis FISEA, Roman Verostko and Peter Beyls (Belgium) laid plans for a panel on Algorithms and the Artist for the Fourth International Symposium on Electronic Art (Helsinki, September 1994). The panel, with Peter as chair, included Brian Evans (US), Steve Bell (UK) and Roman Verostko. With growing interest in these issues Peter proposed and chaired a similar panel, with the addition of Jean Pierre Hebert and Ken Musgrave, at SIGGRAPH in LA the following year (1995). Following this LA panel Roman Verostko, JeanPierre Hebert and Ken Musgrave agreed on working together to establish a common identity. Following months of correspondence and reviewing a range of proposals they adopted the term algorist as proposed by Jean Pierre Hebert. They agreed that the term "algorist" worked well to identify those artists who wrote original algorithms in the process of creating their art. They had proposed and agreed on a term to identify themselves and other artists who followed a similar practice.
Note 3. Jean Pierre Hebert, noting that algorists ought to be defined with an algorithm, wrote a definition identifying an algorist as one who uses one's own algorithms for creating art objects. The Hebert algorithm, as quoted below, dates from correspondence in September 1995:
if (creation && object of art && algorithm && one's own algorithm) {
include * an algorist *
} elseif (!creation || !object of art || !algorithm || !one's own algorithm) {
exclude * not an algorist *
}So artists who create an object of art with a process that includes their own algorithms are identified as algorists.
Note 4. Algorists, those who use algorithms, have been with us for centuries. The use of the term "algorist" to identify a specific group must be understood in the context of its use and context. In the late Middle Ages controversies arose between the "algorists" and "abacists". The algorists having adapted algebra and Arabic numbering found resistance among the abacists with their classical numbering system and Euclidean Geometry. So historically "algorists" were mathematicians who embraced calculating procedures with the arabic numbering system. The use of the term "algorist"applied to artists simply identifies a specialized sector who are artists.